Diferencia entre revisiones de «Diamond, Jared M. 1975.»
Sin resumen de edición |
|||
Línea 4: | Línea 4: | ||
==Abstract== | ==Abstract== | ||
</small> | </small> | ||
A system of natural reserves, each surrounded by altered habitat, resembles a system of islands from the point of view of species restricted to natural habitats. Recent advances in island biogeography may provide a detailed basis | A system of natural reserves, each surrounded by altered habitat, resembles a system of islands from the point of view of species restricted to natural habitats. Recent advances in island biogeography may provide a detailed basis for understanding what to expect of such a system of reserves. The main conclusions | ||
understanding what to expect of such a system of reserves. The main conclusions | |||
are as follows: | are as follows: | ||
#The number of species that a reserve can hold at equilibrium is a.function of its area and its isolation. Larger reserves, and reserves located close to other reserves, can hold more species. | #The number of species that a reserve can hold at equilibrium is a.function of its area and its isolation. Larger reserves, and reserves located close to other reserves, can hold more species. | ||
Línea 11: | Línea 10: | ||
#Different species require different minimum areas to have a reasonable chance of survival. | #Different species require different minimum areas to have a reasonable chance of survival. | ||
Some geometric design principles are suggested in order to optimise the | Some geometric design principles are suggested in order to optimise the function of reserves in saving species. | ||
<small> | <small> | ||
==Resumen== | ==Resumen== | ||
</small> | </small> |
Revisión del 19:08 21 ago 2006
Diamond, Jared M. 1975. The Island dilemma. Lessons of modern biogeographical studies for the design of natural reserves. Biol. Conserv. (7):129-146
Abstract
A system of natural reserves, each surrounded by altered habitat, resembles a system of islands from the point of view of species restricted to natural habitats. Recent advances in island biogeography may provide a detailed basis for understanding what to expect of such a system of reserves. The main conclusions are as follows:
- The number of species that a reserve can hold at equilibrium is a.function of its area and its isolation. Larger reserves, and reserves located close to other reserves, can hold more species.
- If most of the area of a habitat is destroyed, and a fraction of the area is saved as a reserve, the reserve will initially contain more species than it can hold at equilibrium. The excess will gradually go extinct. The smaller the reserve, the higher will be the extinction rates. Estimates of these extinction rates for bird and mammal species have recently become available in a few cases.
- Different species require different minimum areas to have a reasonable chance of survival.
Some geometric design principles are suggested in order to optimise the function of reserves in saving species.
Resumen
Sistemas reservas naturales, c/u rodeado de hábitats alterados ≈ sistema de islas-hábitat en un mar de alteración. Análisis de biogeografía insular predice, con ejemplos de tasas para mamíferos y aves:
- ∑spp sostenibles en una reserva = ƒ(área, aislamiento). Reservas más grandes/más cercanas a otras similares tienen más spp
- si 100-X% de un hábitat es destruido y X % es protegido, reserva perderá spp hasta equilibrio. Entre más pequeña reserva > tasa de extinción.
- Spp ≠ requieren ≠ áreas mínimas para tener probabilidades razonables de supervivencia.
Diseños geométricos y factores determinantes