Moreno, C. y G. Halffter. 2001

De Neotrópicos, plataforma colaborativa.
Revisión del 06:51 8 feb 2007 de Lcgarcia (discusión | contribs.) (nueva referencia)
(difs.) ← Revisión anterior | Revisión actual (difs.) | Revisión siguiente → (difs.)
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda

Claudia E. Moreno, Gonzalo Halffter. 2001. On the measure of sampling effort used in species accumulation curves. Journal of Applied Ecology 38 (2), 487–490.

Original Article On the measure of sampling effort used in species accumulation curves
Claudia E. Moreno*,*Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Carretera Pachuca – Tulancingo s/n, Apartado Postal 69–1, Pachuca, 42001, Hidalgo, México; and ††Instituto de Ecología, AC, Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, 91000, Veracruz, México and Gonzalo Halffter††Instituto de Ecología, AC, Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, 91000, Veracruz, México

  • Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Carretera Pachuca – Tulancingo s/n, Apartado Postal 69–1, Pachuca, 42001, Hidalgo, México; and †Instituto de Ecología, AC, Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, 91000, Veracruz, México

Correspondence: Claudia E. Moreno, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Carretera Pachuca – Tulancingo s/n, Apartado Postal 69–1, Pachuca, 42001, Hidalgo, México (fax 52 (7) 71 72 000 ext. 6641; e-mailcmoreno@uaeh.reduaeh.mx).

Summary

  1. We agree with Willott (2001) that number of individuals would be an appropriate measure of sampling effort to compare species accumulation curves among sites, but the reason is not sampling bias. It has been shown theoretically that number of individuals is an unbiased effort unit when density varies among sites, although our results with bats do not prove this.
  2.  We compared our results using nights and individuals as measures of effort in bat species accumulation curves, but did not detect changes in the estimated richness using the two measures.
  3. We maintain our position about the utility of species accumulation curves as practical tools for inventory assessment, even for very diverse groups. To compare curves from different sites, we agree that number of individuals may be an unbiased measure of effort. But to give practical recommendations for sampling, we suggest that effort also be expressed in standard sampling units.