Lcgarcia en 05:54 8 feb 2007

2007-02-08T05:54:14Z

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 07:54 8 feb 2007
Línea 12:		Línea 12:
	# We compared our results using nights and individuals as measures of effort in bat species accumulation curves, but did not detect changes in the estimated richness using the two measures.<br>		# We compared our results using nights and individuals as measures of effort in bat species accumulation curves, but did not detect changes in the estimated richness using the two measures.<br>
	# We maintain our position about the utility of species accumulation curves as practical tools for inventory assessment, even for very diverse groups. To compare curves from different sites, we agree that number of individuals may be an unbiased measure of effort. But to give practical recommendations for sampling, we suggest that effort also be expressed in standard sampling units.		# We maintain our position about the utility of species accumulation curves as practical tools for inventory assessment, even for very diverse groups. To compare curves from different sites, we agree that number of individuals may be an unbiased measure of effort. But to give practical recommendations for sampling, we suggest that effort also be expressed in standard sampling units.

			[[Categoría:Bibliografía]]

Lcgarcia: nueva referencia

2007-02-08T05:51:15Z

nueva referencia

Página nueva

Claudia E. Moreno, Gonzalo Halffter. 2001. On the measure of sampling effort used in species accumulation curves. Journal of Applied Ecology 38 (2), 487–490.

Original Article
On the measure of sampling effort used in species accumulation curves<br>
Claudia E. Moreno*,*Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Carretera Pachuca – Tulancingo s/n, Apartado Postal 69–1, Pachuca, 42001, Hidalgo, México; and ††Instituto de Ecología, AC, Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, 91000, Veracruz, México and
Gonzalo Halffter††Instituto de Ecología, AC, Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, 91000, Veracruz, México
*Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Carretera Pachuca – Tulancingo s/n, Apartado Postal 69–1, Pachuca, 42001, Hidalgo, México; and †Instituto de Ecología, AC, Departamento de Ecología y Comportamiento Animal, Apartado Postal 63, Xalapa, 91000, Veracruz, México<br>
Correspondence: Claudia E. Moreno, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Carretera Pachuca – Tulancingo s/n, Apartado Postal 69–1, Pachuca, 42001, Hidalgo, México (fax 52 (7) 71 72 000 ext. 6641; e-mailcmoreno@uaeh.reduaeh.mx).

Summary
# We agree with Willott (2001) that number of individuals would be an appropriate measure of sampling effort to compare species accumulation curves among sites, but the reason is not sampling bias. It has been shown theoretically that number of individuals is an unbiased effort unit when density varies among sites, although our results with bats do not prove this.<br>
# We compared our results using nights and individuals as measures of effort in bat species accumulation curves, but did not detect changes in the estimated richness using the two measures.<br>
# We maintain our position about the utility of species accumulation curves as practical tools for inventory assessment, even for very diverse groups. To compare curves from different sites, we agree that number of individuals may be an unbiased measure of effort. But to give practical recommendations for sampling, we suggest that effort also be expressed in standard sampling units.

Moreno, C. y G. Halffter. 2001 - Historial de revisiones

Lcgarcia en 05:54 8 feb 2007

Lcgarcia: nueva referencia