Eisenhardt, K. 1989. - Historial de revisiones

Lcgarcia: /* Sumario (Abstract) */

2017-03-01T01:55:08Z

Sumario (Abstract)

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 03:55 1 mar 2017
Línea 2:		Línea 2:
	==Sumario (Abstract)==		==Sumario (Abstract)==
	[http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/258557.pdf Tomado de publicación online]<br>		[http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/258557.pdf Tomado de publicación online]<br>
	This paper describes the process of inducting theory using case ~~stud- ies~~-from specifying the research questions to reaching closure. Some features of the process, such as problem definition and ~~con- struct~~ validation, are similar to hypothesis-testing research. Others, such as within-case analysis and replication logic, are unique to the inductive, case-oriented process. Overall, the process described here is highly iterative and tightly linked to data. This research approach is especially appropriate in new topic areas. The resultant theory is often novel, testable, and empirically valid. Finally, framebreaking insights, the tests of good theory (e.g., parsimony, logical coherence), and convincing grounding in the evidence are the key criteria for evaluating this type of research.		This paper describes the process of inducting theory using case studies-from specifying the research questions to reaching closure. Some features of the process, such as problem definition and construct validation, are similar to hypothesis-testing research. Others, such as within-case analysis and replication logic, are unique to the inductive, case-oriented process. Overall, the process described here is highly iterative and tightly linked to data. This research approach is especially appropriate in new topic areas. The resultant theory is often novel, testable, and empirically valid. Finally, framebreaking insights, the tests of good theory (e.g., parsimony, logical coherence), and convincing grounding in the evidence are the key criteria for evaluating this type of research.

	[[categoría:bibliografía]]		[[categoría:bibliografía]]

Lcgarcia: Sumario

2017-03-01T01:53:22Z

Sumario

← Revisión anterior		Revisión del 03:53 1 mar 2017
Línea 1:		Línea 1:
	'''Eisenhardt, K. (1989)'''. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557		'''Eisenhardt, K. (1989)'''. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557
			==Sumario (Abstract)==
			[http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/258557.pdf Tomado de publicación online]<br>
			This paper describes the process of inducting theory using case stud- ies-from specifying the research questions to reaching closure. Some features of the process, such as problem definition and con- struct validation, are similar to hypothesis-testing research. Others, such as within-case analysis and replication logic, are unique to the inductive, case-oriented process. Overall, the process described here is highly iterative and tightly linked to data. This research approach is especially appropriate in new topic areas. The resultant theory is often novel, testable, and empirically valid. Finally, framebreaking insights, the tests of good theory (e.g., parsimony, logical coherence), and convincing grounding in the evidence are the key criteria for evaluating this type of research.

			[[categoría:bibliografía]]

Lcgarcia: Nueva página, nueva referencia

2017-03-01T01:37:05Z

Nueva página, nueva referencia

Página nueva

'''Eisenhardt, K. (1989)'''. Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557